Skip to main content




Friday 20 September 2013 - all day - Ottawa (200 C)

Click here for the Meet the Entitles Poster List.



Saturday 21 September 2013 - 10:30 - 12:00 - Ottawa (200C)

P2.001 Evidence meets the media: working with science journalists in South Africa
P2.002 New marketing and communication strategies of the Brazilian Cochrane Centre
P2.003 Consumer involvement in the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group
P2.004 Critical outcomes in a Cochrane systematic review: Patients’ perspective
P2.005 The Cochrane Library publicity programme – promoting Cochrane evidence worldwide
P2.006 The ‘Implications for Practice’ of empty reviews: An analysis of Cochrane systematic reviews with no included studies
P2.007 A Crib Sheet for Cochrane Review Authors' Use of Trial Registries
P2.008 Illuminating review results using systematic evidence mapping
P2.009 Registered paediatric trials worldwide: frequency, location and focus
P2.010 The Therapeutic Drug Management Program: A collaborative initiative of teaching hospitals
P2.012 The potential of text mining to reduce screening workload in systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation
P2.013 Turning a scientific procedure into an online participative tool
P2.014 The Evolution of Technology for Cochrane
P2.015 An innovative tool for incorporating risk of bias ratings into the GRADE assessment
P2.016 Implementing the extended risk of bias tool for non-randomised studies: feedback from the Cochrane Epilepsy Group
P2.017 The effectiveness of interventions for reducing publication bias
P2.018 Factors related to biases of randomized controlled trials published from Japan
P2.019 Assessment of risk of bias due to blinding for objective and subjective outcomes: An exploratory study of Cochrane Reviews
P2.020 Risk of bias in pediatric critical care randomized controlled trials: a systematic review
P2.021 Outcome domains reported by Chinese randomized controlled trials of postoperative analgesia for children
P2.022 Suspected publication bias regarding efficacy of psychoeducative interventions on burden experienced by caregivers of people with dementia
P2.023 Poor reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Risk of Bias Tool in physical therapy trials
P2.024 Selective reporting: a proxy or a more direct indicator of our confidence in the summary estimates?
P2.025 Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of the Selective Reporting of Analyses
P2.026 Comparing apples and oranges? A Bayesian meta-regression of effect estimates from non-randomized studies and randomized controlled trials
P2.027 Glaucoma drug trials: Why 349 trials and 130 unique interventions?
P2.028 Are all Cochrane reviews born equal? Statistical methods in Cochrane reviews (could be improved)
P2.029 Using QUADAS-2 in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies: survey of users’ experience
P2.030 Challenges in conducting a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy of genetic test: an example of the genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia
P2.031 Inter-rater reliability of the QUADAS-2 for assessing screening accuracy studies
P2.032 Direct versus indirect comparisons in systematic reviews of test accuracy studies: An IPD case study in ovarian reserve testing
P2.033 How do authors investigate selective publication in diagnostic test accuracy reviews?
P2.034 Search methods for diagnostic test accuracy reviews in dementia: an overview of a programme grant
P2.035 The Quality Survey of Campbell Systematic Reviews using AMSTAR
P2.036 Poor interpretation of quality assessment results in diagnostic accuracy reviews
P2.037 Using AMSTAR to assess methodological quality of systematic reviews/Meta-analysis of animal studies in China
P2.038 Quality of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy on Alzheimer´s disease dementia and other dementias
P2.039 Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews of interventions published in Chinese surgical journals
P2.040 The Quality of Economic Studies in Respiratory Diseases in China by QHES tool
P2.041 Navigating the rough waters of knowledge translation (KT) research: Effective search strategies for systematic reviews with a KT focus
P2.042 Where to look for studies to include in EPOC reviews
P2.043 Finding evidence from developing countries: the use of regional databases and other search sources
P2.044 Investigating the use of the McMaster Premium LiteratUre Service (PLUS) as a method to efficiently update systematic reviews
P2.045 MAPA: a live meta-analysis with customized tables in a live map
P2.046 Filtering for findability in systematic review search strategies
P2.047 Comprehensive overview of conduct and reporting of cross-sectional studies on STROBE Statement in public health field of China
P2.048 Search filter accuracy to LILACS (via iAHx 2.6-5 interface) for retrieving Randomized Controlled Trials by Brazilian Cochrane Centre
P2.049 Electronic culling of the clinical research literature: Filters to reduce the burden of hand searching
P2.050 To improve the efficiency of database searches for the identification of reports of RCTs used in NICE guidelines
P2.051 On beyond Endnote: doing more with search results
P2.053 The development of highly sensitive retrieval strategy for cluster randomized controlled trial
P2.054 Is there a potential of umbrella reviews to inform guideline development?
P2.055 Analysis of clinical guidelines developed based on evidence in China
P2.056 Use and quality of Cochrane Reviews used in knee and hip osteoarthritis clinical practice guidelines
P2.058 Optimal use of GRADE in Cochrane reviews to inform clinical practice guidelines
P2.059 The use of GRADE methods in World Health Organization (WHO) public health guidelines: distributions of strength of recommendations and confidence in estimates of effect
P2.060 Does journal endorsement of reporting guidelines impact the completeness of reporting of health research? A systematic review
P2.061 PEN - The Global Resource for Nutrition Knowledge Translation
P2.062 The Challenges of Moving Evidence to Practice
P2.063 The growing role and impact of Evidence Aid: its 10-year vision
P2.064 Exercise for lower limb osteoarthritis: systematic review incorporating trial sequential analysis and network meta-analysis
P2.065 Network meta-analysis of multiple outcome measures with extrapolation of effects across networks
P2.066 Closing the research-practice gap using integrated knowledge translation: a practical webinar series
P2.067 A case study on the reporting of effect size estimates in breast cancer trials
P2.068 Legal Issues in Health Technology Assessment: A Case study
P2.069 Trying to introduce systematic comparisons between randomized and non-randomized studies into the surgery field: a case report
P2.070 Enabling engagement: the UK Cochrane Centre’s experience of using social media for communication about Cochrane reviews and more!
P2.071 Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Reviews and Co-publications
P2.072 Brazilian Cochrane Center strategies for disseminating the Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews
P2.073 Barriers to knowledge translation in Chinese doctors: a cross-sectional survey
P2.074 The utility of systematic reviews for informing agri-food public health policy: a survey of Canadian policy makers
P2.075 Evidence-based approaches for evidence dissemination in Cameroon
P2.076 Cochrane Public Health group South Asian Satellite- Public Health Evidence South Asia (PHESA): Early experience
P2.077 Should the PRISMA statement be fully qualified to report an updated meta-analysis? A case report
P2.078 Logic model templates for systematic reviews of complex health interventions
P2.079 Challenges of complex interventions: a worked example
P2.080 Development of a quality appraisal tool for case series studies
P2.081 Using a combined realist and socio-ecological approach to integrating quantitative and qualitative systematic review evidence in a health technology assessment setting
P2.082 What is the current situation of the published N-of-1 trial?
P2.083 IPD meta-analyses are important to improve evidence-based decisions in the geriatric population.
P2.084 A practical taxonomy proposal for systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions
P2.085 Survey of the Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews in Rehabilitation
P2.086 Implementing a HTA-Unit in a University-Affiliated Child Welfare Agency: The Challenge of Adapting the Medical Model of HTA to the Social Services Context
P2.087 Intervention Now To Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): multiple integrated review method exemplar
P2.088 Treatment of quasi-randomised trials in Cochrane reviews
P2.089 Using GRADE to evaluate the quality of evidence in systematic reviews about Chinese traditional medicine
P2.090 Evidence synthesis of implementation studies in health research: A systematic scoping review of methodological approaches
P2.091 Development of an innovative theory-based instrument to assess the impact of continuing professional development activities on clinical practice
P2.092 Rapid evidence reviews: the CADTH experience
P2.093 Improving practice: Rx for Change - an intervention research database for healthcare decision-makers and researchers
P2.094 The Canadian Association of Pediatric Surgeons Evidence-Based Resource: improving patient care and maximizing the use of research resources
P2.095 Experiences and attitudes toward evidence-informed policy-making among Canadian research and policy stakeholders working at the interface of agri-food and public health
P2.096 Effects of decision aids on the accuracy of patient knowledge of outcome probabilities: an investigation of sources of heterogeneity
P2.097 Profile of Overviews published by the Cochrane Library
P2.098 The theory of planned behaviour applied to shared decision making behaviours: a systematic review
P2.099 Better values clarification methods for better decisions
P2.100 Patient-centered care: Is there a state of the art?
P2.102 The Grading of Efficacy-Effectiveness in Clinical Trials (GEECT): a modified PRECIS tool.
P2.103 Is clinically significant decisional conflict prevalent in primary care? A scoping review
P2.104 Decision aids from current systematic reviews for the clinical encounter
P2.105 Online access to personal health information as a key component of shared decision-making: a pilot study in severe mental illness
P2.106 New teaching and research activities of the Brazilian Cochrane Center
P2.107 Participants in the online course “Handsearching: Identifying and Classifying Controlled Trial Reports”
P2.108 Teaching searching in an intensive systematic review course: “how many citations should I expect to review?”
P2.110 Translating one million words into two languages: process approach and lessons learnt from the translation of a comprehensive international guideline database.
P2.111 Disseminating information on medicines and health interventions in Brazilian Portuguese using a internet-based resource: the Cemeds' Blog
P2.112 The Italian IN-DEEP project - Integrating and deriving evidence, experiences and preferences: developing research-based health information applicable to decision making and self-management by people with multiple sclerosis.
P2.011 Shaping HTA to meet new regulatory and pricing evidence requirements in the UK
P2.057 Changing Physician Practice Patterns: Methods for Implementing Clinical Research and Guidelines
P2.101 Patient-centered care and shared decision-making: challenges and proposed approaches
P2.109 Brazil’s growing production of scientific review articles
P2.113 Using a scoping review to identify promising gender-sensitive health promotion interventions for women
P3.002 Measuring and Reporting of Statistical Heterogeneity in Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
P3.020 No RCT is an island: how often do RCTs cite relevant existing Cochrane reviews?
P3.034 'Discussion sections': are we ignoring valuable insights into intervention effectiveness?
P3.066 Evidence mapping: methodological foundations and application to epidemiologic research on sugar sweetened beverages and health
P3.075 Local strategies for disseminating knowledge on evidence: a Cuban project.
P3.076 Evaluation of a wiki-based platform to develop clinical practice guidelines
P4.006 La généralisation des résultats de méta-analyses dans les recommandations formulées par les organisations internationales
P4.053 Evidence from clinical trials is needed: what are Cuban medical journals doing about it?
P4.089 Searching for indirect evidence: advantages and challenges of extending the network of studies



Sunday 22 September 2013 - 10:30 - 12:00 - Ottawa (200C)

P3.001 The reporting of research design of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies in abstracts of Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews
P3.003 The DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Registry: A protocol for a registry to support individual patient data meta-analyses of the diagnostic accuracy of depression screening tools.
P3.004 The assessment of reporting quality on systematic reviews or meta-analyses of diagnostic test published by Chinese authors
P3.005 The Study of Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture
P3.006 Has completeness and quality of systematic review and meta-analysis reporting in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? Subtitle: is completeness of reporting associated with study quality?
P3.007 Methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on interventional in leading Chinese evidence-based medical journals
P3.008 Quality Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma or Metastatic Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review
P3.009 Interventions for Age-related Macular Degeneration: What is the quality of the evidence?
P3.010 Assessment of the quality of reporting for treatment components in Cochrane reviews of acupuncture
P3.011 Assessment of the quality of clinical trials registries
P3.012 Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on glioma
P3.013 The use of Cochrane SR in the development of Clinical Practice Guidelines. The case of Syndromic Management of Sexually transmitted infections and other infections of the Genital Tract. 2012
P3.015 Reducing unnecessary cervical cancer screening: achieving more by doing less
P3.016 Meeting end-user needs through rapid evidence reviews: a partnership case study
P3.017 Summarizing evidence for policy: some limitations of rapid and systematic reviews
P3.018 What's more important - timeliness or accuracy of results in providing evidence? Preliminary results on a research program on rapid reviews
P3.019 Usability of Cochrane-based evidence summaries in point-of-care guidelines
P3.021 The Publishing Characteristics of Cochrane Reviews for Health Policy Research
P3.022 Analysing the Impact Factor of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR)
P3.023 Making Cochrane reviews more clinically accessible: Cochrane Clinical Answers
P3.024 Cultures of evidence among decision-makers in non-health fields: systematic review
P3.025 The limitation of word count in Chinese journals: a potential impediment for implementing the CONSORT statement
P3.026 A family of different dissemination products from one Cochrane Review
P3.027 Moving from evidence to implementation for childhood vaccination communication strategies: synthesising programme experience from low income countries
P3.028 Development of knowledge brokering intervention model based on a systematic review
P3.029 An updated review of the development of Evidence-based Pharmacy: definition, practice and research
P3.030 Engaging nurses in the work of the Cochrane Collaboration: a field’s account
P3.031 The PRISMA evaluate the reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses’ abstracts of cost-effectiveness of pregnancy mortality
P3.032 How to explore user experience when developing communication products
P3.033 A novel approach to presenting adverse effect results: a case study
P3.035 Patient-important outcomes reported in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in mechanically ventilated patients: A systematic methodologic review.
P3.036 Are claims of interventional benefit in clinical trial abstract conclusions justifiable? A case report of pharmacological and complementary therapies for chronic asthma
P3.037 Cross-over trials – are they doing it right? Are we doing it right?
P3.038 Using bivariate meta-analysis and meta-regression to investigate the effects of exercise on pain and disability in osteoarthritis
P3.039 Measurement Harmonization in Individual-Participant-Data Meta-analysis
P3.040 Challenges in conducting a systematic review of predictors and moderators of outcome: an example in psychological therapies for OCD.
P3.041 Statistical simulation to assess results of meta-analyses using post-intervention, change from baseline and mixed methods
P3.042 Which journals have cited Cochrane systematic reviews?
P3.043 Which is more generalizable, powerful and interpretable in meta-analyses, mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD)?
P3.044 The feasibility and reliability of using restricted mean survival time in aggregate data meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes
P3.045 Comparison between Autocad and Draftsight in data extraction
P3.046 Why 196 Cochrane systematic reviews were withdrawn in Cochrane Database of Systematic Review?
P3.047 Supplementary tables for systematic reviews of herbal medicine or acupuncture
P3.048 A hybrid approach for automating citation screening process
P3.049 Underreporting of conflicts of interest among authors of clinical drug trials: cross sectional study
P3.050 Publication bias in randomised trials of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder
P3.051 Publication bias in Clinical Trials on monoclonal antibodies: a cross-sectional study
P3.052 Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of interventions to prevent publication bias
P3.053 Full publication of studies presented at biomedical meetings – updated systematic review of follow-up studies
P3.054 Quantifying bias in randomized controlled trials in child health
P3.055 Completeness of outcome specification across Cochrane systematic reviews of three common eye conditions: Time to be more explicit!
P3.056 Characteristics of the authors of acupuncture related Cochrane systematic reviews
P3.057 Would a timely analysis of secondary outcomes have led to an earlier identification of effective stroke rehabilitation interventions?
P3.058 Methodological Overview: Meta-analyses of Adverse Effects Data from Case-Control Studies as Compared to Other Observational Studies
P3.059 The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews of China health policy
P3.060 The correlation analysis of PRISMA, AMSTAR and GRADE in systematic review
P3.061 Development of the PRISMA Harms Extension
P3.062 Systematic reviews in health policy: method, practice and challenges
P3.063 Modifiable factors influencing recruitment in clinical trials
P3.064 Combining systematic review methods with philosophical analysis for a research ethics review: a case study in bridging disciplines
P3.065 Methodological challenges to assess effectiveness of treatments with retrospective studies : the case of localized prostate cancer
P3.067 Terminology confused: how to name network meta-analysis?
P3.068 How can we improve trials assessing the effectiveness of Screening, Brief intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) for substance use? Methodological issues encountered during a systematic review
P3.069 Variability and completeness of outcome reporting in studies for low back pain rehabilitation interventions: a survey of trials included in Cochrane reviews
P3.070 From health to development: a growing centre of excellence in systematic reviewing
P3.071 Identifying underlying mechanisms between intrinsic and variable prognosticators and clinical outcomes: A structural modelling approach
P3.072 Reaching certainty: a descriptive study of “stable” Cochrane reviews and coming to firm conclusions
P3.073 Methodology of animal studies and impact on aggregating data: why meta-analyses might be inappropriate for preclinical studies
P3.074 A strategy to increase partnerships between health care professionals and Cochrane Canada: Online peer review modules for dietitians
P3.077 Social work and the Cochrane Collaboration: Qualitative interviews with Cochrane contributors of social work background
P3.078 Working with knowledge users to improve evidence-based medicine prescribing and use: key informant interviews and the process of developing an international training collaboration
P3.079 Involving Service Users and Clinicians to Identify Research Uncertainties of Preterm Birth: the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
P3.080 Cochrane reviews need to cope with the flood tide of innovations
P3.081 Feasibility scans could improve prioritization and selection of systematic review topics
P3.082 Prioritisation for Evidence Aid: choosing systematic reviews for the Evidence Aid database
P3.083 A framework to identifying and characterise research gaps from systematic reviews
P3.084 Validating prognosis search filters using relative recall based on prognosis systematic reviews
P3.085 Using a search filter to improve literature searching efficiency for clinical question updating
P3.086 Using social media and crowdsourcing to gather important publications for a scoping review about wikis and collaborative writing tools.
P3.087 Reporting methodological search filter performance comparisons: a review
P3.088 Finding the largest pool of relevant citations in MEDLINE using the Pearl Harvesting Information Retrieval Theory
P3.089 Searching for unpublished data for Cochrane reviews: cross-sectional study
P3.090 Dual monitors to increase efficiency of conducting systematic reviews
P3.091 A numbers of randomized controlled trials reported in Chinese literature are not covered in MEDLINE
P3.092 Proposal to establish a Cochrane Diet and Nutrition Trials Register
P3.094 Evidence about colchicine for gout to be added to 17th WHO EML
P3.095 International cooperation in the abstracts of the 20th Cochrane Colloquium
P3.096 The attention of reporting in journals’under the Chinese Medical Association: research on“instructions for authors”
P3.097 An analysis of randomized controlled trials of tuberculosis prophylaxis and treatment in Africa
P3.098 Transferring knowledge: equity for health professionals in Ethiopia
P3.099 The Use of Cochrane Reviews for Decision Making by a Local Public Health Department
P3.100 Do Cochrane Systematic Reviews help decision makers from middle income countries? Update of the Chilean experience
P3.101 High risk cancer screening in workers exposed to asbestos. Application of evidence through partnerships in managing injured workers.
P3.102 Utilizing a logic model framework to evaluate patient navigation interventions on colorectal cancer screening time to diagnostic follow-up care: a study protocol
P3.103 Evidence-Informed Healthcare Renewal Portal: the development of an online repository of policy-relevant documents addressing healthcare renewal in Canada
P3.104 Evidence-based guideline implementation within Primary Care Practices on Hypertension and Diabetes.
P3.105 Cochrane Journal Club: meeting the expectations of our growing membership
P3.106 Easy access to information on evidence based mental health interventions for children in Norway: The website “Ungsinn” (
P3.107 Designing a social media strategy for a Cochrane entity
P3.108 Consumer participation on a Cochrane review team
P3.109 Café Scientifique – Public Outreach
P3.110 The young doctor’s opinion on Evidence-based Health Care (EBHC) in Stellenbosch University’s medical curriculum
P3.111 Knowledge translation: the number, coverage, and application of Cochrane reviews in China
P3.112 Usefulness of Cochrane Systematic Reviews in Health Technology Assessments in Argentina



Saturday 21 September 2013 - 10:30 - 12:00 - Ottawa (200C)

P4. 102 Accuracy of blood pressure data abstraction from graphs



Monday 23 September 2013 - 10:30 - 12:00 - Ottawa (200C)

P4.001 CRISP: online summaries of Cochrane reviews for policy
P4.002 Reporting of interim analyses, stopping rules, and Data Safety and Monitoring Boards in protocols and publications of discontinued randomized trials
P4.004 Is adequate reporting on health equity in systematic review equivalent to an equitable recommendation? A case report
P4.007 Cochrane’s impact on child health guidance in three Western countries
P4.009 Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer Based on the Global Disease Burden
P4.010 The Endocrine Society Guidelines: when the confidence cart goes before the evidence horse?
P4.011 Publication and appraisal of methodological guidelines: the development of systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials by the Department of Science and Technology of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (DECIT/MOH)
P4.012 Brain metastasis management: difficulties with integrating Cochrane review evidence into guidelines
P4.013 Is replication research informing the results of systematic reviews in knowledge translation research?
P4.014 Tools to evaluate the methodological quality of physical therapy trials. What items should we use from these tools? A factor analysis
P4.015 Network meta-analysis in Health Technology Assessments: how frequently used and how necessary are they?
P4.016 The growing trend of network meta-analyses topic appearance in medical literature
P4.017 Priority Setting Distinguishing Methodological Quality from Report Quality: Assessment Example of Systematic Reviews about Non-pharmacological Intervention for Depression with PRISMA and AMSTAR
P4.018 Development of a topic nomination and selection process with US Medicaid policy makers
P4.019 An approach to deal with the absence of cohort studies in prognosis systematic reviews: a meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies
P4.020 Systematic review and methodological exploration of synthesis methods in public health evaluations of interventions
P4.021 Validation of a quality assessment checklist for case series studies
P4.022 Assessment of methodological quality of systematic reviews of China health policy
P4.023 A QQAQ assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of China health policy
P4.024 Methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta-analysis of interventions on diabetic nephropathy
P4.025 A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews or meta-analysis of interventions on diabetic nephropathy
P4.026 Assessment of the quality of reporting in randomized controlled trials of acupuncture in the Korean literature using the CONSORT and STRICTA statements
P4.027 A Systematic Assessment of the Quality of Systematic Reviews/Meta-analyses on Radiofrequency Ablation versus Hepatic Resection for Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma
P4.028 Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines on the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodule and cancer
P4.029 Low carbohydrate diets and cardiovascular health: an example of a rapid response with high quality reviews to inform public health promotion
P4.030 Reporting guidelines for reporting searches of network meta-analysis are needed
P4.031 Underreporting of conflicts of interest in clinical practice guidelines: cross sectional study
P4.032 The use of collaborative writing applications in healthcare education - a scoping review
P4.033 Wikis and collaborative writing applications in healthcare: results of a scoping review
P4.034 Calculating confidence intervals for the absolute risk reduction taking uncertainties of relative risk and baseline risk estimates into account
P4.035 Translation and validation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias into German
P4.036 The Norwegian electronic health library - helping Norwegian health professionals in accessing English language resources
P4.037 Chronically sick to chronically well: a realistic and concrete way to do things differently with evidence in the canadian system!
P4.038 Health Systems Evidence: the development of a “one-stop-shop” of health systems research evidence to support policymaking
P4.039 Comparison of two experiences of development of healthcare quality indicators
P4.040 Advancing quality in health policy decision-making in the face of uncertainty: an integrated review to characterize and address uncertainty.
P4.041 The Publishing Characteristics of Cochrane Reviews for Nursing Research
P4.042 RCT databases - reducing research wastage from the systematic review process
P4.043 Technological solutions for enhancing efficiency and sustainability of data abstraction in systematic reviews
P4.044 Dealing with Publication Bias
P4.045 Risk of Bias Assessment in Cross-Sectional Genetic Research: The Impact of Genetic Polymorphisms on Methadone Response
P4.046 Does the modified intention-to-treat reporting affect the estimate of the treatment effect in meta-analyses? A meta-epidemiological study.
P4.047 Evidence of design-related bias among studies validating clinical prediction rule: a meta-epidemiological study
P4.048 Randomised clinical trials with negative results: Is there an increase in their reporting?
P4.049 Obtaining confidential protocols to increase the completeness and accuracy of risk of bias assessments for RCTs: an example from recombinant human bone-morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) for spinal fusion
P4.050 Judging the impact of missing participant continuous data on risk of bias in systematic reviews of randomized trials
P4.051 Reporting bias in industry-sponsored spinal fusion studies of recombinant human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (rhBMP-2)
P4.052 Assessing publication bias in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the context of small n trials: application of a capture-recapture method
P4.054 Disturbing Evidence
P4.055 Development of user-friendly summaries for published systematic reviews and meta-analyses in agri-food public health
P4.056 Does a Cochrane contributor facilitate the implementation of evidence-informed recommendations in practice
P4.057 Putting the issues on the table: summarising outcomes from reviews of reviews to inform health policy
P4.058 Critically Appraised Topic (CAT) one-day workshop – ‘CAT in a Day’
P4.059 Developing a conceptual framework for going from evidence to coverage decisions
P4.060 Readability of Cochrane Breast Cancer Group plain language summaries
P4.061 Awareness and use of the Cochrane Library in internal medicine
P4.062 Dissemination of effective physiotherapy treatments - analysing the relevance and usefulness of a large database of evidence summaries
P4.063 What is the most appropriate knowledge synthesis method to conduct a review? A scoping review
P4.064 Assessing generalizability of findings in systematic reviews of public health interventions: Methods of the US Community Preventive Services Task Force
P4.065 The reporting characteristic of qualitative study: a review
P4.066 How rare are adverse drug effects? Assessing the frequency of harm effects of drug treatments for the management of sciatica in primary care
P4.067 Collating the knowledge base for the COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative - a systematic review
P4.068 Development of a question-driven framework for evidence rating in the area of communicable diseases – a project of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)
P4.069 From summary to synthesis: A review of statistical synthesis and presentation methods used in complex reviews
P4.070 Using a theory driven mixed-method review to assess the benefits of complex environmental-health programmes. Cochrane Public Health Group review CD010351
P4.071 Surgical trials and trial registries: a cross-sectional study of RCTs published in journals requiring trial registration in their author instructions
P4.072 Clinical trials of Traditional Chinese medicine need core outcome sets
P4.073 Generating empirical evidence to support methods for overviews of reviews
P4.074 Scoping reviews: a valuable first step in knowledge synthesis
P4.075 Characteristics of published scoping reviews: A scoping review of scoping reviews
P4.077 Using a bibliometric approach for a clinical question that generates a large volume of literature
P4.078 Building a Database of Validated Pediatric Outcomes: An Investigation of Compliance with Established Reporting Standards
P4.079 A user-friendly alert service of high-impact, pre-filtered literature for obstetrics and gynaecology
P4.080 A review of online evidence-based practice point-of-care information summary providers: an update
P4.081 The CONSENSUS Study - Squamous Cell CarcinOma of the OropharyNx: Late PhaSE CliNical TrialS; Core OUtcomeS
P4.082 What’s in ‘Dr Cochrane’ for family physicians? Evaluation of an online Cochrane Learning programme with the Information Assessment Method (IAM)
P4.083 A study of evidence sources used in midwifery training and practice
P4.084 Strategies to fill knowledge gaps in health care - experiences from the Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU)
P4.085 Sharing tacit knowledge to build capacity for knowledge translation: Lessons learned from pan-Canadian public health webinars
P4.086 Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Eyes and Vision: First Steps in Identifying Gaps in Ophthalmology Research
P4.087 Finding research on websites – experiences and solutions from the field of international development
P4.088 What’s in it and how do users find it? –Challenges of knowledge transfer through specialised registers of health promotion effectiveness.
P4.090 Search filter for retrieving overviews of systematic reviews in The Cochrane Library
P4.091 Interobserver reliability for application of tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies
P4.092 Evidence-based Physiotherapy: mapping Cochrane Systematic Reviews with practical implications for clinical practice.
P4.093 Mapping the Cochrane evidence in infectious diseases
P4.094 Do patient decision aids improve patient adherence? Considering definitions and measures when interpreting systematic review findings
P4.095 Screening for decisional conflict in clinical practice: validation of SURE
P4.096 Challenges in SDM education: The heterogeneity of SDM training programs and the search for consensus on core competencies
P4.097 Presentation of continuous outcomes in meta-analysis: a survey of clinicians' understanding and preferences
P4.098 Permutation based resampling for deriving p-vlaues for pooled effect estimates in meta-analsyes
P4.099 Consistency of outcome and statistical reporting of time-to-event data: The impact on Cochrane Reviews and meta-analyses in epilepsy
P4.100 Framing minimal important difference in measuring of quality of life: Absolute or Relative?
P4.101 The current situation of the publication of Cochrane systematic reviews
P4.103 The challenges of establishing and maintaining a multilingual clinical trials register
P4.104 Effectiveness of a brief course in evidence-based medicine for knowledge of the best sources of information in health care among health care workers: first results of the beginning of evidence-based medicine in the Amazonian region
P4.105 Online capacity building in translating research into practice for Latin American researchers
P4.106 Enhancing evidence-based health care (EBHC) knowledge and skills of medical student interns at Stellenbosch University’s Rural Clinical School in Worcester
P4.107 Attitudes towards evidence based medicine among medical students of Universidad Nacional del Sur Medical School of Argentina
P4.108 Training Cochrane Systematic Reviews: Challenges and benefits of online training
P4.109 Building Capacity of Indian Scientists in Conduct of Systematic Reviews: An Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) Initiative
P4.110 Current curriculum and training program of evidence-based health care (EBHC) for undergraduate students: Taiwan’s experience